1) A right of habitation and usufruct are NOT THE SAME.
2) A contract is a contract and unless it's forbidden by law, you can put anything in a contract, meaning some forms are not really good, some are appropriate, etc.
3) I work with Preben from FBI. I haven't had a serious legal conversation with him. Just some exchanges, emails, meetings about property. I can just tell you that I trust the guy and he knows about real estate.
4) I even seen contracts that had no legal value (like a prenup NOT registrated, or a 30 years lease on a title deed that can't be registered) written by Thai registered lawyers in BANGKOK...So, difficult to know what you have, your rights, etc.
All situations and clients are different. Your asset, protection, even relationship is different. You just need to know your options, which fits you and you go for it or not.
In Thailand, it's easy to transfer a house without a lawyer.
But most foreigner can't read Thai. Anyway, they can't own land!!!
You know all these stories about people losing money in Thailand, a house, etc.
This is why, sometimes, it's better to make a contract. SOMETIMES.
I wouldn't be afraid to lose a house if I buy one in my country. Here, under a Thai name...YES.





