Author: Ricky » November 16, 2007, 10:08 am
Immigration – A law (whim) unto themselves.
Try this one.
An ex GF of mine comes from Laos. We still keep in touch from time to time. When we previously lived in Udon, she had her passport, among other things stolen from the house. The police provided a report, which when crossing back to Laos she presented and was allowed through without fuss or further ado.
Recently on a visit to the south of Thailand she had her handbag stolen, in which she had her passport, Lao ID card, ATM card, bank book, mobile telephone, cash and other things. (You may well ask about the wisdom of having all these things together in her handbag, as indeed did I and others). However, she again reported this to the police and obtained a “report”. As they asked if she had a copy of her passport or knew the number, I was able to provide her with photocopy that I still had in my possession.
The following day she borrowed money and traveled back up to Nong Khai and presented herself at the “Friendship” bridge in Nong Khai at around 8.00pm yesterday the 15th November. As before she was sent to the Immigration office, to the side of the booths, where this time she was told she could not cross back into Laos, but instead must go to Khon Kaen to the Lao Consulate to resolve matters (she didn’t understand what she should do there, but maybe they expected her to obtain either a replacement passport or issue further documentation).
She argued with them at length that she had been told by the police that all she needed to do was present their report at the bridge, (as she had done once in the past), it was now night time, she had little or no money, her daughter was sick in Laos and she needed to get home quickly. The officer she spoke to (one of four present) was unrepentant and unyielding, would not contact a superior when she protested and asked him to do so, would not give his name or number, would not telephone anyone else to check anything, would not speak to me on the telephone, did not accept the offer of a 500 baht bribe.
The girl involved was distraught, not knowing what to do and sought my advice by telephone several times during the “encounter”. (She is not a provocative or contentious person. She is quiet and polite, so certainly had not provoked their lack of cooperation or insensitivity.) It was difficult to be able to advise, - but after initially advising her to persist, which was to no avail, - I tentatively suggested a number of things including:-
Sit down on there floor and continue to insist on seeing a superior.
Sleep on their sofa or floor and see what happened, or what the morning brought.
Go back to Nong Khai and stay the night before re-presenting herself at the bridge the next morning, after there had been a change of shift.
Try and find a boat somewhere that would take her across the river illegally.
Stay in Nong Khai overnight and then bus to Khon Kaen tomorrow before going to the Lao consulate there, as requested.
Go outside, wait a few minutes and then board the next mini-bus just before it left and hope they didn’t look or see, or don’t bother. This was on the assumption that if they were going beyond the bounds of their normal practice, (which I felt to be the case as he would not give his name or speak to a superior), they would be reluctant to arrest her, as they would then (maybe) have to complete paperwork justifying their actions and signing their names.
However, I then had to leave the ball in her court as to what to do. She was the one there.
Later she rang me to say that she had taken the last option above – got onto the mini-bus (no one had stopped her) and had crossed to the Lao side of the bridge – where the Llao staff had joked with her about the loss of her passport telling her that she owed them a beer. She was too scared to risk telling them what had occurred on the Thai side.
Consider that this girl had her passport and money stolen whilst in Thailand, most probably by Thai people. She correctly reports it to the Thai police and as advised by them travels directly to Nong Khai and presents that report to the Immigration officials at the bridge, along with a photocopy of her passport personal details page. She had arrived on a 30 day stamp, (and was returning well within that time frame) and had remonstrated with them that they should be able to check she had not overstayed from their computer. (I believe their may have been some doubt as to their ability to do that, but that is their problem/shortcoming. They had not checked previously)
OK, I don’t know the official ruling on such situations, but I do know that she was allowed to cross previously with no problem whatsoever under virtually identical circumstances, and I have heard of others having done the same. If there had been a change of ruling, then I see no reason why the official concerned would not give his name (and number if he had one), or refer her to a superior when requested. That all just smells of them making it up as they go along and them acting upon a whim.
Maybe this is a case of how the second world treats the third world! Or how third rate officials try and demonstrate power or authority.