abler2 wrote:all thoughts are welcome, i will take things one step at a time, for the time being i'll get a 60 tourist visa, previous trips had been under 30 days, although every single day was spent with the lady in question. like most women this one does like to spend money and tight rein had to be kept.
while here i will ask, Q can someone explain the finantial part of the marriage process (with thai lady) i was at a thai/thai wedding a few years ago in which money was given, i assume, by the groom or his family,(to much beer drunk to understand at the time) this has cropped up in conversation with my tgf, can some one tell me the ins/outs of this part.(ie handing over money )
cheers
a
Heh abler2
The money thing is dependent upon the family. But you will normally be expected to pay for the privilidge of removing your potential wife from the other potential she might have. Take that any way you wish.
I personally, when considering marriage and even prior to that, simply refused to consider the concept of paying money. I felt that money was something given in love and or charity and not a precondition for love. Perhaps I was naive, but I made a huge story about how this concept was evil, offensive and unacceptable to me, and I got my way. If I had not, I would never have gone ahead with the marriage.
At the time, I thought I was just doing and saying and objecting to things that I did not agree with, and that sence would prevail. In hindsight, I was bloody lucky, and to this day, I ponder how I managed to find a very eligible young lady without payment of a 'dowry' as the Indians call it. I guess i was extremely fortunate in finding a lady whose thoughts were not all money related, and even more fortunate to find a lady who was prepared to raise a finger against her potentially money grabbing family.
But back to what I think you were asking, ie, 'How much must I pay?'
The answer is 'You can never pay enough'.
For some families, 50,000 baht is ok. To others, that is a joke, so start thinking of up to millions plus, depending upon how the bride is 'valued', ie, young, white skin (yes, they value white more than almost anything, contrary to what you might think) virgin or near so, ability to speak a little of a farang language, if they already have children that you will support etc. Whether you are going to be in town full time might have an influence with some families, as some brides are expected to produce further income from other farang whilst you are away.
You have already stated that you had to keep tight rein on expenditure. I hope you take that as a warning of things to come, 'cause I am sure it is. If you are comfortable with that, great, but if not, you should reconsider as to whether you wish to proceed.
I am in a business here that sees this type of thing daily. When the new farang arrive they are so stary eyed and full of love and totally overwhelmed. I have given many warnings against best advice from others. I have never given a warning that I have morally regretted, as each situation has evolved to be at least as bad as I thought it might, but most have been substantially worse.
But there have been a few occasions when I have felt that the Thai lady has been authentic, ie, what she appears to be is really what she is. But they have been few and far between. Hopefully, your is one of those lovely ones, but you had said a few things that concern me already.
Ok abler2. Once again, best of luck.
Please don't take my words as condemnation of Thai women but simply a statement from experience. And it should also be noted that Thai behaviour and ambition for money is poverty driven and therefore probably understandable. Youthful Thai are obligated to fund the poor family. The trouble appears to stem from the fact (in my view) that Thais have no financial management skills. If they have a thousand baht in their pocket they spend it, with no consideration for the electric bill due tomorrow or the school fees due next week. I wonder if the Bhudda thing is the issue. It seems to promote little acceptance of cause and effect.
John.